Skip to main content

A CBSE school site design study

An anonymized design study for a CBSE school in Odisha. Mandatory public disclosure, fee transparency, and accessibility treated as the spine of the site rather than an afterthought.

// stack

design study · CBSE disclosure · accessibility · fee transparency

Studio · Demonstration · 2026-06-20

The study

This is a design study, not delivered client work. We took the public site of a CBSE school in Odisha as a real world subject, audited it, and used it to work out how a school site should be shaped when the regulated parts are taken as the spine rather than as a page bolted on at the end. The school is kept anonymous here. What follows is the thinking, not a commission.

We chose a school site because it is one of the most honest tests of restraint we know. A CBSE school is required by its board to publish a mandatory disclosure: affiliation, safety, fee structure, the people responsible, and a path for grievance. The temptation is to treat that as paperwork and bury it. We wanted to see what happens when the disclosure becomes the structure the rest of the site hangs from.

What the audit found

We crawled the existing site and scored it against what a CBSE site owes its parents. The disclosure page itself was close to complete, with most of the required certificates uploaded, and the basic identity was in place. The failures were structural and repeated.

The fee schedule and the committee lists existed only as photographs of notices. A parent could see them on a good screen and a screen reader could read none of it. There was no academics page on a school that runs from the early years to Class 12, no admissions process beyond a single form, no faculty named beyond a headcount, and no real notices section. Safety certificates were years old. The information the board requires was present in the narrow sense and unreachable in the sense that matters.

That gap, between published in form and readable in fact, is the brief the study set itself to answer.

What we designed

A site where the mandatory disclosure is the spine, not the basement.

Disclosure as readable structure. Affiliation, the no objection certificate, building and fire safety, water and sanitation, the school management committee, and the parent teacher association are served as documents to be opened and as content to be read, not as flat images. Every required item has a place that is part of the site rather than a link dropped at the bottom of a page.

Fee transparency as text. The fee schedule is rendered as readable, indexable content, with the figures a parent needs stated in plain terms. A family deciding on a school should not have to pinch and zoom a photograph of a notice board to learn what a year costs.

Accessibility as the default. Because the disclosure and the fees are real text and real documents, they are reachable by a screen reader and by a search crawler. That is the point of a disclosure rule, and it is the part the original site broke without anyone noticing.

Why it is here

This study belongs in the set because it documents how we think before we build. The school is anonymous, the work was not commissioned, and we are not claiming a delivery that did not happen. What we are showing is the discipline: when the regulated content is the spine, the rest of the site gets simpler, the parent gets served, and the school meets its obligation in a form a person can use.

If you run a school and want this shape for your own site, that conversation starts at [email protected].

Want a case study like this one?

Send a note. We respond within one business day.